PROPERTY
PERPETUITY
Log inSign up

Interest rates · Originally published · Updated · 2 min read

Archive opinion: Mary Latham’s 2023 warning about changing a letting strategy

A July 2023 Landlord Vision column described the workload behind a short-let experiment. Its personal experience should be distinguished from a market-wide investment forecast.

Property Perpetuity editorial illustration for “Archive opinion: Mary Latham’s 2023 warning about changing a letting strategy” — propertyperpetuity.com
Illustrative artwork · Property Perpetuity

Sign in to save this for later →

Facebook ↗LinkedIn ↗

Mary Latham’s Landlord Vision column published on 17 July 2023 considered the pressures facing landlords during a period of rising borrowing costs. Alongside her views on the market, she described a personal experiment with using a property for shorter stays. The account is most useful as an operational case study, rather than evidence that one letting model will outperform another.

Latham described the additional work and expenditure involved in hosting guests: cleaning, linen, utilities, supplies and responding between stays. Her conclusion was that a higher headline rental income did not by itself make the arrangement attractive to her. She wrote about returning that property to a longer-term letting arrangement.

That was one owner’s experience in a particular place and period. It did not establish the results another property would achieve. This retrospective omits the article’s rate forecasts, third-party personal anecdotes and legal discussion, and does not treat its figures as a current investment projection.

An operational question before a financial one

Our interpretation is that a change of letting model should begin with a description of the work. Who will answer a late arrival query? Who checks the property between bookings? Who notices that a repair is needed, and who arranges access? A plan that leaves those questions unanswered is incomplete even before the income forecast is considered.

A comparison worksheet could distinguish three things: money received, expenses paid and the owner’s time. It could also separate the initial setup period from ordinary operation. That would make it easier to see which assumptions drive a proposed change, without borrowing someone else’s outcome as a forecast.

It is equally useful to write down what would cause the plan to be reviewed. That might be an unacceptable workload, unreliable local support or a mismatch between the property and the intended guests. These are suggested decision criteria, not claims about any market’s likely returns.

The enduring interest in Latham’s account is its emphasis on lived management experience. Read it as a dated contribution to the discussion about running rental homes, not a recommendation to buy, sell, remove tenants or adopt a particular business model.

Reference source ↗