PROPERTY
PERPETUITY
Log inSign up

Property · Originally published

Supported housing: the campaign to make work pay for young residents

Centrepoint’s pre-Budget campaign called for linked changes to Housing Benefit rules so that young residents could progress in work without losing financial stability.

Property Perpetuity editorial illustration for “Supported housing: the campaign to make work pay for young residents”
Illustrative artwork · Property Perpetuity

Sign in to save this for later →

Facebook ↗LinkedIn ↗

Supported housing is intended to provide stability while people build a more independent future. Ahead of the November 2025 Budget, Centrepoint argued that the interaction between two benefits could undermine that purpose for young residents starting work or increasing their hours.

The charity’s campaign focused on people whose rent was supported through Housing Benefit while Universal Credit covered living costs. It said the combined rules could create a point at which additional earnings left a resident worse off overall, increasing the risk of arrears rather than strengthening financial security.

Centrepoint estimated that 30,000 young people were affected. That was the organisation’s estimate, rather than a new official count of every supported-housing resident. Its September 2025 demonstration in Parliament Square sought to bring the issue to MPs’ attention before the autumn fiscal announcement.

The charity proposed two linked changes. First, it wanted the earnings disregard used in Housing Benefit calculations increased from £5 to £57 a week. A disregard is the portion of earnings left out when the benefit calculation is made.

Second, it proposed reducing the Housing Benefit taper from 65% to 55%. In the briefing’s explanation, a lower taper would mean less benefit withdrawn as relevant earnings increased. Centrepoint argued that both changes were necessary to address the problem across the affected group.

Its policy briefing presented the reforms as a way to support employment, reduce housing instability and help residents move towards independent accommodation. These were campaign proposals and projected benefits, not confirmation that the changes had been enacted.

For the housing sector, the debate illustrates why accommodation, support and income cannot always be treated as separate issues. A place to live may provide the foundation for work, but the financial transition also needs to be manageable.

This archive explainer records the argument before the 2025 Budget. It does not calculate anyone’s entitlement or establish their present benefit position.

Reference source ↗