PROPERTY
PERPETUITY
Log inSign up

Commercial · Originally published · 3 min read

Viewpoint: should property businesses look beyond their usual bank for finance?

A Siemens Financial Services executive argues that confidence and awareness can hold back SME investment. The useful question is which funding approach fits the actual project.

Property Perpetuity editorial illustration for “Viewpoint: should property businesses look beyond their usual bank for finance?” — propertyperpetuity.com
Illustrative artwork · Property Perpetuity

Sign in to save this for later →

Facebook ↗LinkedIn ↗

Property-sector businesses considering equipment, technology or operational investment may benefit from questioning whether their usual bank is the only funding route worth examining. That does not mean taking finance is always the right decision.

In a Financial Reporter opinion article published on 4 November 2026, Julian Hobbs, chief executive of commercial finance at Siemens Financial Services, argues that confidence and awareness are important barriers to SME investment. His view is that discussion should extend beyond an immediate borrowing cost to the business objective and the different ways an investment might be funded.

This is a finance-industry executive’s argument, not a finding that every small firm can obtain credit or that reluctance to borrow is irrational. An individual business may have sound reasons to defer a project, use its own cash or avoid a long-term commitment. The article’s useful challenge is to examine the options deliberately rather than assume there is only one.

Define the investment before the funding

For an agency or property-services firm, start with a specific description of the proposed improvement. What problem does it solve, what evidence supports the expected benefit and what would happen if the benefit arrived later than planned? A broad ambition to modernise is not yet a costed project.

Prepare a cash-flow view that includes implementation, training, disruption and ongoing support, not just the initial purchase price. Ask the people who will use the equipment or software what the transition involves. That can make the funding conversation more realistic.

Compare alternatives on a consistent basis

Ask an adviser to explain the options appropriate to the project and the business. Compare the total commitment, security, flexibility and consequences of early termination or a change in plans. Make clear which projected gains are estimates rather than guaranteed receipts.

Do not assume an asset-finance arrangement, a business loan and a cash purchase transfer ownership or risk in the same way. Request an explanation of the specific contract, including what happens at the end.

Keep the decision grounded

A wider search is valuable only if it improves the decision. Record why the preferred route fits, what assumptions could undermine it and what would trigger a review. A business may still conclude that postponement is the sensible option.

Hobbs’s contribution is a prompt to broaden the conversation. Property businesses should apply it through their own evidence and qualified advice, rather than treat an industry viewpoint as a recommendation to borrow.

Source: Julian Hobbs, Financial Reporter, 4 November 2026. This article is commentary, not individual financial advice.

Reference source ↗