New analysis reported by Property Industry Eye on 2 November 2026 examines market-rent decisions at the First-tier Tribunal. The research, attributed to Landlord Sums, offers a picture of challenged increases rather than the private rented sector as a whole.
The analysis covered 667 decisions made on or after 1 May 2026. It reported that the tribunal set rent below the landlord’s proposed amount in 70% of cases, while 26% of proposals were approved in full. A typical increase sought was reported as 14%, compared with a typical permitted increase of 7.7%.
Those figures need their context. They concern cases which reached a published decision, not every rent change discussed or agreed between a landlord and tenant. Some decisions also concerned notices served before the May changes. The analysis cannot establish what proportion of all landlords proposed an inappropriate increase or predict the outcome of an individual dispute.
Keep the evidence and the question aligned
For a reader comparing rent research, begin with the population being measured. A dataset of disputed cases answers a different question from a survey of advertised rents, or a measure of rents paid across all tenancies. Percentages should stay attached to the group and period they describe.
When discussing a particular home with an adviser, a clear record of the property, the proposed amount and the documents received will make the conversation more useful. Ask what evidence is relevant and what steps need attention. A headline about typical outcomes is not a substitute for checking the facts of that case.
Avoid using averages as an automatic formula
A reported typical percentage should not be copied onto another property as a recommended increase or expected reduction. Location, condition and the evidence available may differ. Similarly, a difference between the amount requested and the amount determined does not, by itself, explain every reason for the decision.
The useful lesson is to read the underlying scope before drawing a conclusion. This research highlights the importance of well-supported rental evidence, while leaving the merits and procedure of any live dispute to be assessed separately. Readers facing an actual notice or deadline should seek timely advice on their own circumstances.