PROPERTY
PERPETUITY
Log inSign up

Landlords · Originally published · Updated · 2 min read

Osric Path rent repayment order: what the 2023 decision actually established

A historical tribunal decision ordered £28,600 in rent repayments plus fees. An award is not evidence that the money was received, and today’s claim rules need separate checking.

Property Perpetuity editorial illustration for “Osric Path rent repayment order: what the 2023 decision actually established” — propertyperpetuity.com
Illustrative artwork · Property Perpetuity

Sign in to save this for later →

Facebook ↗LinkedIn ↗

A rent repayment headline should distinguish a tribunal award from money actually received. The published decision concerning 4 Osric Path in London provides a useful example: it records an order, not proof of subsequent payment.

The historical decision

On 30 August 2023, the First-tier Tribunal ordered a total rent repayment of £28,600 to five applicants, together with reimbursement of £300 in tribunal fees. The reference is LON/00AM/HMF/2023/0061.

The tribunal found that the property required an HMO licence under the additional licensing arrangements relevant to the applicants' occupation and that it had not been licensed. The decision records council confirmation as part of that evidence. It also records that the respondent did not attend and had been barred from further participation following failure to comply with directions.

These are findings in that dated case. They do not establish the property's licensing status or condition today. Nor does the decision demonstrate whether the applicants subsequently recovered the award.

[Read the tribunal's published decision](https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64ef51b26bc96d000d4ed317/4_Osric_Path_Decision.pdf).

An order and enforcement are different stages

Current government guidance explains that a tribunal sets a payment date when making an order. If the landlord does not pay, a tenant can seek county court enforcement after converting the tribunal judgment into an enforceable county court judgment.

That distinction matters when reading a report describing tenants as having received a payout. Check whether the evidence is a decision, a settlement or confirmation of payment; these are different things.

Use the rules for the relevant period

The government's guidance, updated on 1 May 2026, expressly distinguishes offences committed before that date. Its newer rules must not simply be applied retrospectively to this 2023 decision. Eligibility, timing and the amount recoverable need to be checked against the actual circumstances.

[Read current rent repayment order guidance](https://www.gov.uk/guidance/rent-repayment-orders-guidance-for-tenants).

For landlords, retain licensing applications, decisions and correspondence alongside occupancy records. For tenants considering a claim, organise the tenancy and payment evidence and obtain individual advice before relying on a headline amount. This is a historical case note with current signposting, not a prediction of the outcome of another claim.

Reference source ↗