PROPERTY
PERPETUITY
Log inSign up

Property · Originally published

Children in temporary accommodation: reading Shelter’s classroom research

Shelter’s January 2026 report connects housing instability with the experiences teachers see at school.

Property Perpetuity editorial illustration for “Children in temporary accommodation: reading Shelter’s classroom research”
Illustrative artwork · Property Perpetuity

Sign in to save this for later →

Housing discussions often focus on buildings and waiting lists. Shelter’s Homelessness in the Classroom research brings attention to children’s experience of temporary accommodation. This archive article was reviewed on 15 October 2026, with the research publication distinguished from the original news report’s date.

What Shelter’s report examines

Shelter’s research page, published on 26 January 2026, stated that one in 78 schoolchildren in England was homeless in temporary accommodation. The report examines effects on children’s wellbeing, education and relationships through teachers’ observations.

That figure is a dated statement about England. It should not be presented as a current UK-wide total or an assessment of an individual pupil. Teachers’ accounts are a perspective on the issue; an accurate summary should identify whose experience the research captures.

Questions for a joined-up response

For housing and education teams, the report is a prompt to ask how practical information reaches the right person. Who should a family contact when accommodation changes? How can a school explain the support it can offer? Which organisation can answer questions outside the school’s remit?

These are suggested questions for service planning, not claims about an existing entitlement or a particular family’s needs. Ask families what communication works for them rather than assuming that every household in temporary accommodation has the same circumstances. Agree a clear next step and identify who will follow up.

Use the evidence without labelling children

When sharing research, retain the date and geographical scope alongside the statistic. Avoid describing a child through a housing category alone or repeating personal details that are not needed for the discussion. A public article should not become a substitute for a confidential conversation with the appropriate support team.

The value of the report is that it broadens the questions asked about housing stability. Property Perpetuity’s practical takeaway is to look beyond the address and ask how services communicate with families. Specific decisions about support should be based on current information and the household’s circumstances, not inferred from a national ratio.

Reference source ↗