PROPERTY
PERPETUITY
Log inSign up

Lending · Originally published · 2 min read

Phoenix Money joins BDLA: what property borrowers should still check

The short-term property lender has joined the trade association. Membership is useful industry context, while the suitability and terms of each loan still need individual assessment.

Property Perpetuity editorial illustration for “Phoenix Money joins BDLA: what property borrowers should still check” — propertyperpetuity.com
Illustrative artwork · Property Perpetuity

Sign in to save this for later →

Facebook ↗LinkedIn ↗

Phoenix Money Group has joined the Bridging & Development Lenders Association as a lender member, Mortgage Strategy reported on 4 November 2026.

The report describes Phoenix Money as a privately funded provider of short-term property finance across the UK. Its stated bridging-loan range runs from £50,000 to £5 million, with uses including property purchases, refinancing and auction finance. These are descriptions of the lender’s proposition, rather than an offer to any particular applicant.

BDLA chief executive Adam Tyler welcomed the firm’s experience to industry discussions. Phoenix Money managing director Manish Gambhir said participation would allow the business to contribute to the issues affecting its market. The announcement concerns trade-association membership; it does not establish that an individual loan is suitable for a borrower.

Start with the purpose and exit

For someone considering short-term finance, a sensible first question is what the borrowing needs to achieve. Write down the purchase or project timetable, the intended repayment route and what would happen if that route took longer than expected. This gives an adviser something concrete to test against the proposed loan.

An auction purchase, for example, needs a funding discussion that matches the actual contractual deadlines. A proposed refinance needs a separate examination of the assumptions behind the next loan. Do not treat an expected future valuation or sale as a completed event when planning the exit.

Compare the whole proposal

Ask for a written explanation of the amount advanced, interest treatment, fees, security and repayment requirements. Compare the total cost over a realistic holding period rather than using the headline rate as the entire comparison. Clarify which charges are payable upfront and which may be added to the borrowing.

Also ask who is advising you, who will make the lending decision and what information remains outstanding. Association membership can help explain a firm’s place in the industry, but it does not replace those transaction-specific questions.

This announcement adds another participant to the BDLA’s lender membership. For property investors and developers, the useful next step is still a careful comparison of a written proposal with the project’s needs, supported by appropriate independent advice before committing.

Reference source ↗